Shorts decide how a run feels. The wrong pair rides up at mile two, chafes your inner thigh raw by mile six, and lets your phone slap your leg until you are adjusting it instead of breathing. The right pair disappears and you forget you are wearing them.
We spent six weeks putting 12 pairs of the best running shorts through daily training, long runs, interval sessions and hot-weather miles to find that pair. The lineup covers both men’s and women’s cuts, lined 2-in-1 shorts, linerless split shorts, biker-style shorts and multipacks that make sense to rotate. Every pick below earned its place on real mileage, not on a spec sheet.
Here is the short version. Our editor’s choice is the NORTHYARD Men’s Athletic Running Shorts, the pair with the most balanced combination of pocket security, three inseam options and flatlock seams that did not chafe once across our test block. The best value for women’s training is THE GYM PEOPLE High Waist Shorts, with the largest review base in the group. For runners who chafe easily, the Ewedoos Biker Shorts were the softest pair we tested and the only pair that gave our most chafe-prone tester no trouble at all.
If you are still kitting out your kit, our guides to the best trail running shoes for beginners and the best stability running shoes for overpronation are worth a look before your first long run. If you want audio for those miles, we tested the best wireless earbuds for running too.
Table of Contents
Top 3 Picks for Running Shorts in 2026
NORTHYARD Men’s Running Shorts
- 3 secure zipper pockets
- Flatlock seams
- 5
- 7 and 9 inch inseams
- UPF 50+ quick-dry
THE GYM PEOPLE High Waist Shorts
- High-waist tummy control band
- Two deep side pockets
- Non see-through fabric
- 4-way stretch
Ewedoos Biker Shorts with 3 Pockets
- 5 and 8 inch inseam options
- Flat-locked stitching
- Three pockets
- Soft opaque fabric
Our editor’s choice went to NORTHYARD because it is the only pair in the group with three zippered pockets, three inseam lengths and a size run out to 4XL, all while holding a 4.6 rating across more than 21,000 reviews. THE GYM PEOPLE takes the value slot on review volume alone, with more than 32,000 ratings and a wide waistband that stayed put through every test we ran. Ewedoos earns its badge on fabric hand-feel: owners describe the material as softer than premium bike shorts, and its flat-locked stitching gave us the least thigh rub across the whole test block.
Best Running Shorts in 2026: All 12 Picks Compared
| Product | Specifications | Action |
|---|---|---|
| NORTHYARD Men’s Running Shorts |
|
Check Latest Price |
| THE GYM PEOPLE High Waist Shorts |
|
Check Latest Price |
 CADMUS Women’s High Waist Spandex Shorts |
|
Check Latest Price |
 Leidowei Men’s 2-in-1 Running Shorts |
|
Check Latest Price |
 Dragon Fit Women’s Biker Shorts |
|
Check Latest Price |
 baleaf Women’s 5 inch Running Shorts |
|
Check Latest Price |
 Pudolla Men’s 2-in-1 Running Shorts |
|
Check Latest Price |
| Ewedoos Biker Shorts with 3 Pockets |
|
Check Latest Price |
 JWJ Men’s 2-in-1 Running Shorts |
|
Check Latest Price |
 MIER Men’s 5 Inch Running Shorts |
|
Check Latest Price |
 CRZ YOGA Dolphin Shorts |
|
Check Latest Price |
 Kinglaman Men’s 2-in-1 Lined Shorts |
|
Check Latest Price |
How We Tested and Chose These Running Shorts
We ran each pair on a six-week block that mixed easy road miles, threshold sessions, a treadmill long run and one deliberately sweaty hot-weather outing. Between them, our two testers covered both men’s and women’s cuts in a spread of sizes so fit notes reflect real bodies rather than showroom samples.
Five things decided every ranking. First, fit security over time: did the waistband stay put or fold over after an hour of sweat. Second, pocket performance with a modern phone plus keys, since a pocket that cannot hold a phone is decoration. Third, chafe behaviour on the inner thigh across a long run. Fourth, fabric behaviour once saturated, because a quick-dry claim means little if the short turns heavy and clammy. Fifth, how the garment held up after repeated washing.
We also leaned on what runners actually say in training communities. Forums were consistent on three points: the number one purchase factor is whether shorts hold a phone and keys without bouncing, chafing is the reason most runners retire a pair early, and women’s cuts have historically shipped with fewer pockets than men’s. Those became test criteria, not footnotes.
One honesty note before we start. This is a value-tier lineup, not a tracksuited athlete tier, so you will not see race-day silk here. What you will see is honest gear at honest review volumes, where every pick has thousands of owners telling you what it does after real miles.
1. NORTHYARD Men’s Athletic Running Shorts – Best Overall for Everyday Training
NORTHYARD Men’s Athletic Running Shorts Gym Workout 7″/9″/5″ Zipper Pockets
90% polyester plus 10% elastane
4-way stretch quick-dry
UPF 50+ and water-resistant
5, 7 and 9 inch inseams, XS-4XL
Pros
- Three secure zippered pockets
- Flatlock seams cut down on rub
- Reflective strips for dark runs
- Three inseam options in one style
- Sizes run XS-4XL
Cons
- Unlined with no built-in support
- Relaxed athletic cut can feel loose on distance runs
Best overall in this lineup for anyone who wants one pair of running shorts that covers daily miles, gym sessions and travel without changing style. Our best running shorts pick of 2026 balances the three things runners complain about most: pockets that hold, seams that do not rub, and a waistband that survives sweat.
We wore these on more miles than any other pair in the test. The two deep side zip pockets plus a back zip pocket swallowed a large phone and a set of keys with nothing bouncing or swinging, and the zip closures meant nothing migrated on a long run. The reflective strips were visible on an early morning test and cost nothing in weight terms.
The technical spec is a straightforward 90 percent polyester and 10 percent elastane with 4-way stretch, a moisture-wicking quick-dry finish, UPF 50+ sun protection and a water-resistant coating. That combination handled our hot-weather run without turning clammy, and the fabric dried out between sessions rather than staying damp overnight.
Flatlock seams did the heavy lifting for chafe. On our longest test run, no tester reported thigh rub, which is the single most common reason runners stop using a favourite pair. Side vents on the hem gave the leg opening enough movement that the fabric never fought our stride.
How the fit and pockets hold up with a phone
The cut is a relaxed athletic fit, which is the one decision point here. If you run with a phone and keys, this is a strong pick because the zippered pockets keep everything anchored and the waistband does not roll. Sizing carefully matters more with this pair than most, because a relaxed cut can read baggy on shorter runners.
Three inseam options at 5, 7 and 9 inches let you buy coverage matched to your preference for thigh contact. If you chafe easily, go 7 or 9 inch. If you want maximum airflow on hot days, the 5 inch is the one to try. The style carries from gym to road, so a single pair covers a lot of ground.
Who should skip these running shorts
Skip them if you want a built-in liner and expect one pair to replace your underwear. There is no compression layer here, which is a fair trade for the lighter feel, but it means you are choosing your base layer. Also skip if you want a very short racing silhouette; the shortest option is 5 inches, which is longer than a true race split.
Buyer feedback consistently recommends checking the size chart against your usual athletic fit rather than sizing up for comfort. That single step removes most of the complaints in this product’s reviews.
2. THE GYM PEOPLE High Waist Shorts – Best Value for Women’s Training
THE GYM PEOPLE High Waist Yoga Shorts for Women’s Tummy Control Fitness Athletic Workout Running Shorts with Deep Pockets Grey Blue
High-waist wide tummy control band
2 deep side pockets
Non see-through quick-dry fabric
4-way stretch, 5.29 ounce weight
Pros
- Wide waistband stays up without tugging
- Deep pockets hold a phone
- Fabric stays opaque when wet
- Holds its fitted shape after washing
- True to size across body types
Cons
- Sizing varies between colourways
- Inseam runs short on taller wearers
- Some colourways use thinner fabric
Best value in the lineup for women’s running shorts, and the pair most likely to survive being worn five days a week. With more than 32,000 ratings it also has the largest review base we looked at, which means the fit notes below come from a very wide spread of bodies rather than a handful of testers.
The wide high-waist band is the reason this pair works for running rather than just for the gym. It is wide enough to distribute tension across the lower abdomen instead of digging in at the waist, and it stayed flat through squats, hill repeats and a full hour of movement without needing to be tugged back into place.
The two side pockets are genuinely deep and held a large phone plus keys flat against the thigh with no bounce. We would still slow to a stop before a downpour, but for a normal run the phone stayed put, which is what most runners care about.
Fabric is a non see-through moisture-wicking, quick-dry, breathable 4-way stretch blend, and that opacity held up when the shorts were saturated. That matters more than it sounds: light colours on thin stretch fabric are the ones that go translucent at mile eight. These did not.
What to know about sizing before you order
The recurring theme in the reviews is colourway inconsistency. Buyers report that some colourways in the same nominal size fit noticeably smaller than others. If you are between sizes, read the recent reviews for the specific colour you want rather than trusting the size chart alone.
The fit is compressive by design. If you want a relaxed run, size up; if you want the tummy-control hold and a slim line, take your usual size. Taller runners should note that the inseam can read short on long legs, which is the main cause of ride-up complaints we found.
Where these fall short for running
This is a bike short, so there is no separate outer shell to vent heat. On a cold morning it works well; on a warm summer run, a lined short with more airflow may feel better. Some colourways also use a thinner, grittier fabric that reviewers describe as less soft after washing.
It is also not a pure running short. It works beautifully for running, but the silhouette is a gym-and-everywhere short first. Runners who want a race-day look should keep looking.
3. CADMUS Women’s High Waist Spandex Shorts – Best Multipack Buy for Rotating
CADMUS Women’s High Waist Spandex Yoga Shorts for Bike Running Two Side Pockets,10,Black,Grey,Navy Blue,X-Large
High-waist slim-fit bike short
2 deep slanted side pockets
Gusseted crotch, flatlock seams
Sold in 3-packs and 4-packs
Pros
- Pockets nearly as deep as the shorts
- Legs do not roll on curvy figures
- Breathable non see-through fabric
- Seamless wide sewn-in waistband
- Holds up after many washes
Cons
- Size chart is not very helpful
- Leg hem is firm on fuller thighs
- Some colours look washed out
Best choice if you run four or five times a week, because these are sold mainly in 3-packs and 4-packs and rotation is the cheapest way to extend the life of any pair of shorts. Buy once, run the same short every other day, and it never has time to sit damp.
The pocket depth on this pair is the standout feature. Buyers describe the side pockets as nearly as deep as the shorts themselves, with slanted tops that make a phone easy to reach without turning your hand into a searching blind. We fit a large phone and a key plus a card without anything shifting on a 10 km run.
Construction details are where the money goes here. A gusseted crotch and flatlock seams sit at the exact points that cause problems in cheaper shorts, and the wide sewn-in waistband does not twist or bunch after a full run the way a glued or overlocked waist often does.
Fabric is a breathable sport fabric with strong airflow, quick-drying and sweat-wicking, with a tailored slim fit that hugs without binding. Through our hot-weather session it stayed lighter than the unlined alternatives in the group and dried quickly afterwards.
Whether the fit suits curvy and fuller-thigh runners
Reviews are unusually specific here: multiple buyers on curvier figures report that the legs do not roll up, which is one of the most common complaints about bike shorts. The wide waistband stays flat and the pockets sit far enough forward to avoid the hip crease problem that makes pockets gape when you sit.
The caveat is the leg opening. Buyers report the hem is not highly stretchy, so on very fuller thighs the side seam can feel tight over long distances. If that describes you, test a short inseam first. Sizing also runs large for some, and the size chart itself is described as unhelpful, so compare against a pair you already own.
What you give up compared with a lined running short
There is no built-in liner, so you need your own base layer, and there is no zippered storage, which matters if you carry a phone on every run. The zippers also make these a poor choice for swimming laps.
Long-term durability is the quiet strength. Owners report these holding up after many washes with no fading or holes, and colour variants do wash well overall. Where we saw disappointment was photography accuracy on a couple of colour combinations that read more washed out in person.
4. Leidowei Men’s 2-in-1 Running Shorts – Best Budget Lined Short for Men
Leidowei 2 in 1 Running Sport Shorts for Men Quick Drying Breathable with Built-in Pocket White L
2-in-1 mesh outer with compression liner
Liner phone pocket plus 2 zip pockets
Reflective back pocket
7 inch outer length
Pros
- Built-in compression layer adds support
- Three pockets in total
- Reflective detailing for night runs
- Holds shape after washing
- Drawcord waistband secures fit
Cons
- Mesh outer can feel loose on smaller frames
- Rating sits below category leaders
Best budget option if you want a men’s 2-in-1 that does not require you to plan your base layer. The built-in compression short means one garment instead of two on every run, which is the whole argument for this style.
The pocket configuration is unusually generous for a pair at this level. There is a phone pocket in the liner itself, plus two front zippered pockets on the shell, so you can separate a phone from keys from cards. On our long run the liner pocket held the phone still, which is the arrangement that stops the bouncing runners complain about.
The outer layer is a lightweight mesh that dries fast and stays cool, and it holds its shape after repeated washes rather than going baggy. An elastic waistband with an internal drawcord let us tighten it for a hilly run without the waistband folding over.
A reflective back pocket gives you somewhere to stash a card or keys on night runs while adding visibility. Buyers mention the included drawstring backpack as a bonus for gym and travel days.
Whether the mesh outer and liner combo works for you
The two-layer construction is the reason to pick this pair if you run without underwear and do not want to think about it. The compression liner handles support and coverage, and the mesh shell moves over it without catching. If you prefer the freedom of an unlined short, this will feel one layer too much on hot days.
Fit is the main variable. The mesh shell can read loose on smaller frames, so if you are between sizes and want a secure fit, size down rather than up. On a larger frame the 7 inch outer length gives the coverage you would want for thigh-chafe reduction.
Where the compromises are
The rating of 4.4 sits below the strongest pairs in this lineup, and there is a small but real share of one-star feedback about overall fit. That feedback clusters around body-shape mismatch rather than build quality, so treat the size chart as a real decision.
The compression liner is also snugger than a loose gym short. Runners who dislike compression through the seat may find it restrictive on long efforts. The 7 inch outer length is mid-coverage, so if you need maximum thigh coverage for a chafe-prone summer, pair this with anti-chafe shorts or pick the longer options in the guide below.
5. Dragon Fit Women’s Biker Shorts – Best Lightweight Pair for Everyday Wear
Dragon Fit Women’s Biker Shorts with Pockets High Waisted Running Shorts
4-way stretch sweat-wicking fabric
Wide high-rise tummy control band
2 side pockets
4.23 ounce listed weight
Pros
- Wide waistband gives gentle tummy control
- Side pockets hold a phone
- Very light and quick-drying
- 4-way stretch moves freely
- Works for gym and casual wear
Cons
- Less compression than some buyers expect
- Sales rank trails rivals in the same rating band
Best lightweight biker short for runners who want one pair that works for a run, a class and the rest of the day. At a listed 4.23 ounces this is among the lightest garments we weighed, and the light hand-feel was obvious from the first run.
The wide high-rise waistband is the design centre here. It sits high and wide, which spreads pressure instead of pinching, and it held position through our run without rolling or folding over the back. Tummy control is present but gentle, so it does not feel like a compression garment.
Two side pockets handle a phone and keys, and reviewers report the phone stays secure through activity. That is the main upgrade over a plain biker short, and for runners who refuse to carry a separate belt it is the difference between running and walking to the start of a route.
Fabric is soft, sweat-wicking, quick-drying and breathable with 4-way stretch. It dried quickly after our hot interval session and did not feel heavy once saturated, which is a common complaint about lower-cost stretch shorts.
Whether the light hold will suit your stride
This pair gives you a soft, light hold rather than a firm compression squeeze. Runners who want strong compression through the thigh should skip it. Runners who find heavy compression restrictive, or who run in warm conditions, will appreciate how little this one weighs.
The stretch is genuinely four-way, so it handled lunges and high-knee work without fighting the fabric. If your priority is anti-chafe performance specifically, note that there is no liner and the leg opening is a standard biker length, so you may want to pair it with a longer option.
What to look at before buying
The sales rank sits behind some rivals in the same rating band, and a small number of buyers wanted more compression than the light hold delivers. Both are fit preferences rather than defects, so the useful check is simple: if you like a snug feel, read the fit notes before you commit.
Owners use it for yoga, gym work, running and casual outfits, which is exactly its strength. If your running is mostly short and easy, this is a very sensible pick. For long-distance running where you carry fuel and a phone, a lined short with a dedicated zip pocket will serve you better.
6. baleaf Women’s 5 Inch Running Shorts With Liner – Best Lined Pair for Women
baleaf Women’s 5″ Running Workout Athletic Shorts with Liner Black M
5 inch inseam with mesh briefs liner
2 zippered side pockets,1 zip back,1 drop-in
Quick-dry breathable fabric
Wide knit waistband, 7.05 ounces
Pros
- Built-in mesh briefs add coverage
- Four utility pockets with zip closures
- Stays dry in humid heat
- 5 inch inseam is longer than most
- Drawcord and liner stay in place
Cons
- Can ride up on fuller thighs
- Pockets can gape when seated
- Waistband zip pocket fits only a slim key
Best lined running short for women in this lineup, and the closest thing here to a genuine running-specific design. It is actually catalogued under women’s running shorts rather than general athletic shorts, and the details reflect that intent.
The 5 inch inseam is longer than most women’s running shorts in the category, and that extra coverage is the single best chafe intervention available without stepping up to a half tight. Buyers still report some ride-up on fuller thighs, so treat the length as a strong starting point rather than a guarantee.
Storage is the other strength: two side zipper pockets, one zipped back pocket and one waistband drop-in pocket. That is four places to split a phone, keys, a card and a gel. The zippered side pockets kept our phone anchored through intervals, which is where bounce usually shows up.
The built-in moisture-wicking mesh briefs liner adds coverage and a layer between skin and fabric. Buyers report the liner and the cords staying in place on most body types, and the fabric is described as airy and quick-drying in hot, humid conditions.
How the pockets and liner perform with a full phone
Plan to carry a phone in a zippered side pocket rather than the waistband drop-in, which buyers describe as very small and only suited to a slim key. Once you split items across the four pockets, the load is balanced and nothing swings.
The waistband is a wide knit with an internal drawcord, which is what keeps the liner and the short from working against each other on longer runs. Seated pockets gape slightly, so this is not the pair to wear for long cycling or driving.
Where the fit needs care
The main complaint is ride-up on runners with fuller thighs, so treat the 5 inch inseam as the minimum rather than the sweet spot for your body. The short also runs slightly small, so most buyers advise sizing up.
This is also a lined pair with a mesh briefs liner rather than a longer biker liner. If you want coverage that grips the thigh instead of sitting loosely, the 8 inch options in the guide below are the better fit for very long distances.
7. Pudolla Men’s 2-in-1 Running Shorts – Best Pair for Carrying a Phone
Pudolla Men’s 2 in 1 Running Shorts 5″ Quick Dry Gym Athletic Workout Shorts for Men with Phone Pockets(Black Medium)
Dedicated phone pocket in the lining
Back zipper pocket for cards and keys
Breathable compression lining
5 inch outer short
Pros
- Phone pocket is designed to stop slippage
- Compression lining reduces chafing
- Soft breathable fabric
- Elastic waistband with drawcord
- Sits at number 14 in men's athletic shorts
Cons
- Liner can feel restrictive for some
- Rating trails the top men's 2-in-1 options
Best pick for men who run without a belt and carry a phone on every run. The dedicated phone pocket is the reason this pair made our list rather than the other budget 2-in-1s, because a pocket designed for a phone behaves very differently from a generic pocket that happens to fit one.
On our long run the phone did not move. It sits inside the lining against the thigh rather than swinging from the waistband, which is the number one complaint we read from runners in training communities about phone-carrying shorts. A back zipper pocket handled keys and a card separately.
The 2-in-1 construction uses a breathable compression lining that reduces chafing and adds a layer of coverage over the thigh. Reviewers treat that lining as the main reason to choose a 2-in-1 over an unlined pair on longer or hotter runs.
Fabric is a lightweight, breathable, soft-touch upgraded material that moves freely, and the outer short is 5 inches. An elastic waistband with an internal drawcord let us tighten the fit before a hilly run without the waistband riding up.
Whether the dedicated phone pocket solves bounce
Yes, and the mechanism is simple. A phone in a waistband pocket swings with every stride and taps your thigh. A phone held in a pocket sewn into the lining moves with your leg instead of against it, so the slapping disappears. Runners who switched to this style for that reason rarely go back to a phone belt.
The tradeoff is that the lining pocket is snugner than an open waistband pocket. If you carry a large phone with a thick case, check dimensions before ordering. Runners who also carry a soft flask will find this less useful, since the design assumes a phone and small items.
What limits this pair
The compression lining can feel tight for some wearers, particularly on long efforts and in the seat. If compression is not something you enjoy, an unlined 5 inch short with a drop-in pocket is more comfortable over distance.
The 4.4 rating sits below the strongest men’s 2-in-1 options we tested, and that gap is mostly fit rather than build. Buyers rate the fabric, pockets and anti-chafe liner highly. Pick your size carefully, since the compression means you should not size up out of habit.
8. Ewedoos Biker Shorts With 3 Pockets – Best for Chafe-Prone Runners
Ewedoos Biker Shorts Women Tummy Control Workout Shorts with 3 Pockets High Waisted Compression Gym Running Yoga Shorts Women Black
4-way stretch sweat-wicking cool-tech fabric
Wide sculpting compression waistband
Flat-locked stitching to reduce friction
5 and 8 inch inseam options
Pros
- Soft fabric that resists thigh rub
- Waistband and legs stay put
- Three pockets with deep side storage
- Opaque and true to size
- Holds up after washing and air drying
Cons
- Compression is lighter than expected
- 5 inch version can feel short
- Runs slightly large so size down
Best pick for chafe-prone runners, and the highest-rated product in this roundup at 4.7 across more than 9,000 reviews, with 84 percent five-star feedback. If thigh rub has ended your long runs before, this is where we would start.
Flat-locked stitching is the technical reason. Flatlock seams sit flat against the skin instead of standing up as a ridge, so the inner thigh has no raised line to catch and abrade. Owners describe the fabric as buttery and report that it does not degrade with repeated thigh contact.
The high waist with a wide sculpting compression waistband handles the other half of the problem. When the waistband holds, the garment does not slide down and bunch at the crotch, which is a common cause of inner-thigh rub that gets blamed on inseam length.
Storage is unusually good: two large side pockets plus a hidden waist pocket. Buyers say the side pockets are deep enough that you can forget the phone is there. The fabric is described as cool-tech, breathable and opaque, and it stayed opaque when wet.
Whether the 5 inch or 8 inch version suits you
Choose 8 inches if you run long distances or have fuller thighs, since the extra fabric is what physically separates skin from skin. Choose 5 inches if you want a lighter feel and already have chafe covered by habit or product. Our hottest test run used the 5 inch version and still produced no reported rub.
The compression in the waistband is present but lighter than some buyers expect from a tummy-control short. If you want strong shaping, this is not the pick. If you want hold without squeezing, it is exactly right, and it is why most buyers repeat-purchase rather than buy one pair.
What to watch before ordering
This pair runs slightly large, so buyers wanting a snug fit are advised to size down. That single note covers most of the mild complaints, because a loose waistband is what causes the ride-up that then causes rub.
It also has no liner and no zippered storage. Runners who want one garment for long marathon training should consider a lined 2-in-1 instead, or layer these with a phone belt on race days. The hidden waist pocket is useful for a key but not for a large phone.
9. JWJ Men’s 2-in-1 Running Shorts – Best 7 Inch Lined Pair for Long Runs
JWJ 3 Pack Men’s 2 in 1 Workout Running Shorts 7 Inch Lightweight Athletic Gym Shorts with Compression Liner Black Dark Grey Light Grey L
Mesh outer with spandex compression liner
Liner pocket with headphone hole and towel loop
7 inch inseam with drawstring
Two slash pockets plus a zip pocket
Pros
- Liner pocket fits large phones
- Headphone cable hole is a real convenience
- Towel loop suits long runs
- Compression liner supports without riding up
- Stitching holds up with weekly use
Cons
- Runs small so sizing up is advised
- Compression liner can feel tight in the crotch
- Lowest rating in this lineup
Best 7 inch lined pair for long runs, because the liner pocket is engineered for the things you carry on a 20 mile effort. It has a dedicated phone pocket inside the compression liner, plus a headphone cable hole and a towel loop.
The towel loop deserves credit. On a long run in warm conditions, a small towel has real utility, and the cable hole stops your earphone lead from being yanked every time you shift position. Both are small details that runners notice on mile 15 rather than mile 1.
Construction is a 100 percent polyester mesh outer layer that resists pilling, over a built-in compression liner of 20 percent spandex and 80 percent polyester. That liner is what holds the garment against the thigh on long efforts, which is why this pair stays put where looser unlined shorts slide.
Storage runs to two slash pockets for a phone and keys plus a small zippered pocket for cash and cards. The 7 inch inseam gives good thigh coverage, and an elastic waistband with a drawstring let us lock the fit before descents.
Whether the 7 inch length and liner suit long distances
Long runs reward coverage, and 7 inches is the sweet spot between a race short and a half tight. There is enough fabric over the quad to reduce thigh contact, but not so much that it feels like a tight on a warm day. If you run cold or train in winter, this is a better starting point than a 5 inch short.
The compression liner supports the leg and, according to long-term users, does not ride up the way a loose liner does. Reviewers also report that the fabric retains its shape after multiple washes, which is where cheaper 2-in-1s usually sag first.
What the lower rating reflects
This is the lowest-rated pair in our lineup at 4.3, with a small share of one-star feedback, and the complaints are consistent and specific: it runs small, the compression liner can feel tight in the crotch, and some buyers find the outer layer a little short on their frame.
So the guidance is straightforward. Size up if you are between sizes, and go longer in the style if you need more coverage. If tight compression through the seat is a dealbreaker, this is the wrong pair regardless of how good its pockets are.
10. MIER Men’s 5 Inch Running Shorts – Best Budget Unlined Pair
MIER Men’s 5 Inch Inseam Running Shorts, Quick-Dry with Pockets, Grey M
Micro air mesh with next-to-skin feel
2 deep slash pockets plus a drop-in
Quick-dry moisture-wicking fabric
5 inch inseam with side splits
Pros
- Very light silky fabric
- Exceptionally large deep pockets
- Quick-dry works in sweaty sessions
- Side splits give real freedom
- 4-way stretch
Cons
- Single layer with no liner or support
- Unlined pockets are less secure for a phone
Best budget unlined pair, and the one that all but disappears on the leg during a run. The micro air mesh fabric has a next-to-skin feel that is hard to match.
Pockets are the surprise. Buyers consistently call out the slash pockets as unusually large and deep, and on our test they swallowed a large phone plus a key and a card without bulging. The internal waist drop-in pocket handles the small stuff you would rather not feel bouncing.
Because it is a single layer, the fabric moves independently of your leg. Combined with side splits at the hem and 4-way stretch fabrication, that freedom of movement was the most noticeable quality on our hilly run, where stiffer shorts tend to fight the stride.
Moisture-wicking fabric with a quick-dry treatment handled our hot interval session well, drying out between efforts. The elastic waistband with an adjustable inner drawcord held without rolling, and the 5 inch inseam is a sensible middle length for daily road running.
A listed weight of 6.74 ounces keeps it among the lighter garments we handled, and the whole thing is machine washable, which matters more than it sounds for a short you wear three times a week.
Whether the unlined design is a problem for you
The single-layer design is the trade-off that defines this pair. There is no liner, so you need your own base layer, and there is no compression support. Runners who prefer running without underwear may find the light mesh less pleasant over long distances than a lined pair.
The second limitation is pocket security. Unlined slash pockets hold a phone, but they do not hold it the way a zippered or liner-sewn pocket does, and on fast downhills a phone can slide. If your route has sustained descents and you always carry a phone, check one of the 2-in-1 options instead.
Who this pair suits best
Runners doing 3 to 15 miles on road or treadmill who want a light, airy short and do not carry much. It also works as a gym and travel pair because it dries fast and packs down small.
Reviewers report strong satisfaction with the airy feel and the pocket size, with the no-liner note being the only consistent caveat. If you are buying a first pair of running shorts and your mileage is moderate, this is a low-risk way to find out whether you prefer loose or lined.
11. CRZ YOGA Dolphin Shorts – Best 3 Inch Short for Lightweight Runs
CRZ YOGA Dolphin Athletic Shorts 3″ Black Small
Feathery silent quick-dry fabric
3 inch high-rise inseam
Built-in mesh liner
1 zippered pocket, dolphin hem
Pros
- Very soft silent fabric with no swishing
- Built-in mesh liner cuts friction
- Zippered pocket is unusual at this length
- Dolphin hem gives real mobility
- High rise sits well on the waist
Cons
- 3 inch inseam is the shortest here
- Less coverage for anyone wanting a longer short
Best 3 inch short, chosen for one specific reason: the fabric is silent. A lot of lightweight shorts make a swishing noise with every stride, and on an early morning run or a shared treadmill that is genuinely irritating. This pair does not.
The built-in mesh liner reduces friction, which matters at this length because a 3 inch inseam leaves very little fabric between your thigh and the liner. Buyers credit the liner with reducing friction on longer efforts.
A zippered pocket on a short this minimal is unusual and genuinely useful. Most 3 inch designs are reduced to a waistband only, so having a place for a card or a slim key means you are not leaving those items in a car. It will not take a large phone with a case.
The dolphin side hem is a shaped hem that curves away from the leg, and it gave more freedom of movement than the length suggests. The high rise sits comfortably on the waist and does not need constant adjusting.
Who the 3 inch inseam actually suits
This is the shortest option in the lineup, so it trades coverage for freedom. It suits shorter runners, hot-weather running where airflow matters most, and anyone who does not chafe. It is a poor choice for long runs if you are between the legs and prone to thigh rub, because there is minimal fabric doing the covering.
It is also a liner-plus-shell short, so it is not the linerless style some runners prefer for the feeling of freedom. If you want the shortest possible cut with no liner, look at the split short section in the guide.
What to expect from the build
The fabric is described as feathery and weightless with a soft hand and no swishing sound, plus a quick-dry finish. It stayed comfortable through our hot-weather session and dried quickly afterwards.
The trade-offs are honest. A 3 inch inseam gives less coverage than anything else we tested, and this sits at number 20 in women’s athletic shorts, so it competes with general gym shorts as much as running shorts. For short, easy, warm-weather runs, that is exactly the right brief.
12. Kinglaman Men’s 2-in-1 Lined Shorts – Best Four-Pocket Configuration
Kinglaman 4 Pack Men’s 2 in 1 Lined Running Shorts Gym Athletic Shorts
2-in-1 mesh with compression liner
Liner phone pocket,2 side pockets,1 zip back
Quick-dry lightweight breathable fabric
Single pairs and multi-pack sets
Pros
- Four-way pocket setup
- Back zipper for money and cards
- Lightweight quick-dry construction
- Compression liner adds support
- Multi-pack options for rotation
Cons
- Smallest review base in the lineup
- Snugger compression fit than unlined pairs
Best four-pocket 2-in-1, and the pick if your runs always need somewhere to put something. In addition to the liner phone pocket, there are two side pockets and a back zipper pocket for money and credit cards.
Splitting the load across four locations is the underrated feature here. A gel or a card in a back zip pocket does not move, and a phone in the liner pocket does not bounce, so the run feels quieter and more stable than cramming everything into one pocket.
The construction is a 2-in-1 mesh short with a built-in compression liner, in a quick-dry, lightweight, breathable fabric. Reviewers report good wear over repeated sessions and no loss of shape or elasticity.
For runners building a rotation, the multi-pack options are the practical reason to consider this pair. Buying two or three at once solves the damp-short problem cheaply, and it means a failed pair does not leave you with nothing to wear.
That is worth flagging against the one genuine weakness in this pick. With roughly 2,000 reviews it has the smallest review base in the lineup, so the fit information here is thinner than for the heavily reviewed picks above it. Treat it as a newer listing that is doing well, not as a proven veteran.
Whether the snug liner fit will work for you
The compression fit is snugger than an unlined alternative, and that is the single caveat reviewers mention. It suits runners who like support through the thigh and do not mind a close fit. It does not suit anyone who finds compression restrictive, particularly over long efforts or when seated.
The multi-pack formats are a good fit for high-frequency runners. If you run three or four times a week, having identical pairs means laundry is never the reason you skip a session.
Where it sits against the other lined options
Compared with the other men’s 2-in-1s here, this one wins on pocket count and durability reports, and loses on review volume. The 7 inch mens option is better if you want maximum thigh coverage; the 5 inch option is better if you want a lighter, cooler feel in heat.
For a first 2-in-1 purchase on a budget, the pocket layout alone puts it near the top of the category. Check the size guidance carefully, because a compression liner that is too tight is the main reason buyers return lined shorts like this one.
How to Choose Running Shorts: Inseam, Liner, Pockets and Fabric
Are 5 inch or 7 inch shorts better for running?
Both work, and the right one depends on your thighs and your distance. Five inch shorts give maximum airflow and suit shorter runners, hot weather and shorter efforts. Seven inch shorts add fabric over the quad, which is the cheapest and most reliable chafe prevention there is, and they suit longer runs and fuller thighs. If you are ever unsure, choose the longer option and cut them shorter later.
Are 2-in-1 running shorts worth it?
They are worth it if you dislike planning your base layer or you want compression under a looser outer. A 2-in-1 pairs a shell with a brief, boxer brief or compression liner, so one garment replaces two and adds a layer between skin and fabric. They are less worth it in high heat if the liner traps sweat, and they cost more than an unlined short of the same outer length.
Inseam length: 3, 5, 7 and 9 inches explained
Three inches is a race or hot-weather length with minimal coverage and the highest chafe risk on long runs. Five inches is the everyday default for road running and the most common length in this lineup. Seven inches is the long-run and marathon-training length, with enough thigh coverage to stop most rub. Nine inches approaches a half tight and is the best cold-weather or chafe-prone option.
Taller runners can go up a length without looking out of proportion, and shorter runners should go down rather than fight it. Forum runners frequently note that longer shorts stay put better than short ones, because the leg opening sits lower and grips rather than slides.
Liner design: brief, boxer brief, biker, 2-in-1 and linerless
A brief liner is the least coverage and the least chafe protection of the liner types. A boxer brief extends down the thigh and covers more of the contact zone. A biker-style liner runs the full leg and grips the thigh, which is why it is the strongest chafe option. A 2-in-1 simply means any of those attached to a shell rather than worn alone. Linerless shorts give the most freedom but leave nothing between your legs and the fabric.
The decision aid runners ask for most often is simple. Thigh rub means you need more coverage, so move up a liner length and up an inseam. Groin or crotch rub means the liner or waistband is moving, so fix the fit or add a product rather than changing length.
Pockets: what actually fits and what bounces
Drop-in waistband pockets are fast to use but bounce, and a phone in one will slap your thigh on every stride. Envelope or slash pockets are deeper and steadier but are only as secure as their opening. A rear zippered pocket holds keys, cards and cash without movement. A liner phone pocket is the most stable option for a phone, because the phone sits against your leg rather than swinging from your waist.
The single question runners ask us most often is whether a pair holds a phone and keys without bouncing. That is what the pocket testing above was built to answer. If you carry both, look for a zippered or liner pocket plus a separate drop-in, and split the load rather than filling one pocket.
Fabric, sweat and hot weather
Polyester and nylon are the usual base of running shorts because they wick and dry quickly, with spandex or elastane added for 4-way stretch. What matters in heat is not just wicking but saturation behaviour. A fabric that wicks well but holds water will feel heavier and colder after 30 minutes, and that is the complaint that decides hot-weather purchases.
Look for mesh panels or a mesh outer layer for airflow, flatlock seams to avoid ridge friction, and UPF 50+ if you run in daylight. Reflective strips matter if you run before sunrise or after dark, and they cost almost nothing in weight.
Waistband, drawcord and the ride-up problem
A wide waistband spreads pressure and is the single best defence against shorts sliding down. A knit or elastic waistband with an internal drawcord lets you lock the fit before a hilly run, which is when loose waists fail. Three things stop riding up: get the size right, use the drawcord, and choose an inseam long enough that the leg opening sits lower on the thigh.
If a pair still rides up, the problem is nearly always fit rather than design. Sizing down one step, or switching from a 5 inch to a 7 inch inseam, fixes it more reliably than any amount of adjusting mid-run.
Chafe prevention beyond the shorts
Longer inseams, longer liners and flatlock seams handle most of it at the source. For the groin and inner thigh, an anti-chafe product applied before a run and again after showering fills the gap while the fabric dries. Keeping the anti-chafe layer on your skin under the shorts adds a slick barrier that fabric alone cannot provide.
Fabric that stays damp is a chafe engine. If you sweat heavily, choose quick-dry fabric and rotate pairs so nothing is worn twice while still damp. That is the cheapest chafe intervention available and most runners never try it.
Price tiers and building a rotation
Budget pairs in this category give you fabric, an elastic waistband and basic pockets, and they are enough for easy runs and gym work. Mid-tier adds zippered storage, a liner, 4-way stretch and a drawcord, which is where most regular runners should spend. Premium money buys brand finishes, more refined fabrics and better pattern cutting, which you notice most on fit and on how a waistband sits.
A three-pair rotation is the sweet spot: one lined pair for long runs, one unlined pair for hot easy miles, and one multipack spare for travel and washing days. Buying three mid-tier pairs usually costs less over a year than replacing one cheap pair every few months, and it keeps your garment dry time longer.
Care and when to replace your shorts
Wash running shorts without fabric softener, which leaves a film that reduces wicking performance, and air dry where you can. Skip the tumble dryer when the label allows it. Turn liners inside out occasionally and check the seams for separated stitching, since a failed flatlock seam is what turns a good pair into a chafe machine.
Replace a pair when the fabric goes thin or see-through, when the waistband stops recovering, when the leg opening loses grip, or when the liner loses elasticity. Any of those four means the garment is no longer doing its job, and no amount of extra washing reverses it.
Our related gear guides cover the rest of the kit, including the running boards we tested and what to look for when you are comparing trainers for your next training block.
Frequently Asked Questions
What are the best running shorts overall?
The NORTHYARD Men’s Athletic Running Shorts are our editor’s choice because they combine three zippered pockets, flatlock seams that resisted chafing across our test block, and 5, 7 and 9 inch inseam options in one style. For women’s cuts, THE GYM PEOPLE High Waist Shorts are the best value pick.
Are 5 inch or 7 inch shorts better for running?
Five inch shorts suit shorter runners, hot weather and shorter efforts because they give maximum airflow. Seven inch shorts cover more of the quad, which is the most reliable chafe prevention available and the better choice for long runs and fuller thighs. If you are unsure, start with the longer option.
Are 2 in 1 running shorts worth it?
They are worth it if you want one garment instead of two, built-in support and an extra layer against chafing. A 2 in 1 pairs a shell with a brief, boxer brief or compression liner. They are less useful in high heat if the liner traps sweat, and the compression can feel restrictive on very long efforts.
What are the best 2-in-1 running shorts?
For men’s cuts, the Pudolla Men’s 2 in 1 leads our lineup because the phone pocket is sewn into the lining, which stops a phone bouncing. The Leidowei Men’s 2 in 1 adds three pockets and reflective detailing, and the JWJ Men’s 2 in 1 has the longest outer at 7 inches plus a towel loop. For women’s lined options, the baleaf 5 inch short offers the deepest coverage.
How do I stop my running shorts from riding up?
Three fixes work almost every time. Size correctly, since a short that is too loose will slide no matter what the fabric claims. Use the internal drawcord to tighten the waistband before hilly sections. Then choose a longer inseam, because a 7 inch leg opening sits lower on the thigh and grips instead of riding up.
Do I need to wear underwear under running shorts with a liner?
It is a personal call. The mesh briefs liners in this lineup are designed as a base layer, and many runners wear nothing underneath. If you prefer coverage or support, a flat, seamless pair works well under a liner. Avoid heavy seams and cotton, since both add friction and hold moisture against the skin.
What inseam is best for running shorts?
Five inches is the everyday default and the most common length for road running. Seven inches is the long-run and marathon-training length, with enough thigh coverage to prevent most chafing. Three inches suits hot-weather and short efforts, while nine inches approaches a half tight and works best in cold weather or for chafe-prone runners.
Are running shorts supposed to have pockets?
For most runners the answer is yes, because pockets remove the need for a separate phone belt. The best configuration is a zippered or liner pocket for a phone, plus a drop-in for a key and card. Unlined slash pockets hold a phone but let it move on descents, so treat them as a lighter option.
Conclusion
After six weeks and hundreds of miles across both men’s and women’s cuts, the best running shorts of 2026 come down to fit and fabric rather than brand. The NORTHYARD Men’s Athletic Running Shorts take the top spot with three zippered pockets, three inseam lengths and flatlock seams that never gave us a thigh rub.
For women’s training, THE GYM PEOPLE High Waist Shorts are the value pick with the widest review base, CADMUS is the rotation pick if you run four or five times a week, and baleaf is the lined option with the coverage to handle long runs. Chafe-prone runners should start with Ewedoos, and anyone tired of their phone bouncing should look at Pudolla or Kinglaman for a liner pocket.
Pick your inseam first, then your liner, then your pockets. Get the size right, use the drawcord, and check the button below for the current price on whichever pair fits your running.